Are you pro-life or pro-choice?

@queue

The name calling doesn't bother me that much per se. But it's a useful device to avoid arguing the issues at hand.

Queue has all the hallmarks of an imbecilic troll.

#77: "It's a shame the U.S. doesn't "share" it's nuclear weapons on some of the shitholes in this world."

So... You want to save something that isn't alive, but wouldn't mind killing every man/woman/child/creature/organism with a nuclear weapon. #troll

If you haven't caught on, I've used several preposterous examples in this thread to expose the underlying flawed logic of baby killers. I know it is a breach of etiquette to actually call a baby killer a baby killer, it is much more sophisticated to redefine humans as a "piece" of tissue in or to rationalize an ungodly act.
What is the greater knowledge? The realization that the Earth moves around the Sun? Or the realization that you should not kill?
There is no right and wrong, there is only the arrogance that remains after you have made your choice.
If exposing human nature is trolling, then I am guilty. It should be noted that no one has directly engaged many of the points I have brought up, only feigned shock and offense while trying to justify butchery.
You have to live with your choices, unfortunately, so do the rest of us. The unborn do not have that dilemma in some people's minds.

You have made no arguments... merely assertions that a featus is not tissue but human... that it equates to murder.

Clearly not everybody believes this to be the case.

killing is unavoidable, as is death. It is only when MOTIVE is involved that determines murder. It is only human nature that seeks to rationalize away the guilt of what by a clear definition of what constitutes murder. Correcting the mistake of "accidently" becoming pregnant by invoking a reverse king Solomon decree is not the logical conclusion to be learned from the moral lesson. Equating the natural progression of the unification of a sperm and an egg and it's inevitable consciousness to a malignant cyst is disingenuous at best. Some statements are worthy of scorn! - If you can't spell fetus, how should I expect you to know what it is? What you have tricked yourself into believing does not change the reality. Once again, you have raced to the technical argument of redefining what nature shows us is needed to create consciousness, and avoided the philosophical and intractable proof that motive infers murder.

@84 I agree (troll face)
When a person kills an unborn baby they are not only killing that 'baby' but killing all the 'babies' that the baby could have been involved in creating. Not only that , exponentially the genetic tree that was stopped so early in its manifestation has killed off more people than the most evil of dictators. This is why anti-abortion folks (religious intelligent campaigners) sometimes kill full formed humans because it is a small revenge on the genocidal foetus killers who plague the world of potential humans.
'The invisible man in the sky' said abortion is bad, that is why I am against it.
In summary, When a foetus is killed, the person doing it, is in essence, a mass murderer. God in the sky said so.
lol I just tried queue style trolling
boring
silly topic
do what you want with your own body and stop telling others what to do
fanatics

Thanks for playing CPT. You may be surprised to learn the Bible places the value of an infant male @ 5 shekels, but only if they are over 1 month old. Females only garner 3. This must enrage the feminazi's to no end. Regardless, this speaks more to property value than choice. Apparently, it never occurred to "God in the sky" that a person would inflict such mayhem upon their own bodies! Yes brethren, there is no divine commandment that forbids you from ripping life from your body and throwing it in a biohazard bag. It's just one of those deep philosophical underpinnings that you accept or reject. There is no need to invoke God when the choice is clearly been given to you.
True, no amount of proselytizing can, or is meant to convert those who can not believe, likewise no amount of rationalizing, or good intent will alter the road to hell.
The gift of life is like a birthday present. No one of sound mind, when presented with a gift, (even an unwanted one) would cast it upon the ground and trample it. The proper thing to do would be to wait the requisite time period and re-gift it. Even heathens can agree to this time honored etiquette. How much more so with a bundle of joy than a yellow necktie?
It is not my place to condemn those who make make poor choices, I can only ask the profound question - What did you THINK was going to happen? Because "planned parenthood" is one of those phrases used by people who excel at neither planning or parenthood.
"The Emporer has no clothes."
"Frailty, thy name is women"

Jesus...

My most successful thread since the day I registered at lichess ... I'm so proud of myself! :)