| Lichess Feedback - Openings names on games played#1 This is BRILLIANT ! Thanks a lot ! | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - I don't understand the new rating system.#4 For further info and insights about a possible future ranking system, it's being discussed here : http://fr.lichess.org/forum/lichess-feedback/my-opinion-of-the-new-rating-system | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - I don't understand the new rating system.#3 You won 13 points on your blitz rating (1491+13=1504). Your standard rating does'nt change with the same amount as it is a wieghted average on the three time controls. | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - My opinion of the new rating system.#88 In fact, it's not even "why not". It makes a lot more sense to get three separate rankings, one for each time control. | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - My opinion of the new rating system.#87 Fine ! And without an overall rating, let's say bye bye to an overall ranking :) Why not ! | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - New variant: Three-check#2 Fun, thanks ! Seems tricky ! I can smell sacrifices ! :) | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - My opinion of the new rating system.#53 seems* | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - My opinion of the new rating system.#52 Every other guessing seem just fine to me ;) | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - My opinion of the new rating system.#49 It does make sense. And cynosure's solution does too. A standard rating as a weighted average on 3 time controls doesn't say much to me. That doesn't matter that much though :) | smndvd |
| Lichess Feedback - My opinion of the new rating system.#46 Makes sense to me. About the standard rating matter; as you said, "The Standard rating is just a separate rating that changes whenever you play a game that isn't 960 or KotH, and the rating change is … | smndvd |
| Next |
|---|